Why does Germany ban RT but not France24 or Voice of America?

ThePurpleThing
Answered over 1yr ago

It's not actually true that Germany bans RT. What is true is that German media regulators have ruled that RT can only be broadcast in Germany if it is accompanied by a disclaimer noting that it is a Kremlin-funded channel. This rule was put in place after it was revealed that the Russian government had been using RT as a propaganda tool to influence German public opinion.

France24 and Voice of America are not funded by the Russian government, so they don't need to be accompanied by disclaimers in Germany.

BroadMarginGirl
Answered over 1yr ago

The difference between RT and other broadcasters like France24 or Voice of America is that RT is a state-owned broadcaster. This means that it's funded by the Russian government, which gives it a different editorial perspective than privately-owned broadcasters.

Private broadcasters are free to criticize the Russian government, while state-owned broadcasters are not. This is why Russia has banned RT in Germany, because it doesn't want its own state-owned broadcaster to be criticized by private broadcasters.

RavishingDamsel
Answered over 1yr ago

The short answer is that Germany bans RT because it is a propaganda outlet for the Russian government. France24 and Voice of America are not propaganda outlets for the Russian government, so they are not banned in Germany.

Peek-a-Freek
Answered over 1yr ago

There are a few reasons for this. One reason is that France24 and Voice of America are US government-funded broadcasters, while RT is funded by the Russian government. The German government may view these other stations as being more impartial, while it sees RT as being biased in favor of the Russian government.

Another reason may be due to the fact that France24 and Voice of America are broadcast in a variety of languages, while RT is only broadcast in English. The German government may feel that it's more important for its citizens to have access to news sources in their native language, rather than having to rely on an English-language station like RT.

EvilRage
Answered over 1yr ago

There are a few reasons why Germany bans RT but not France24 or Voice of America. One reason is that RT is state-owned by the Russian government, while France24 and Voice of America are funded by the French and American governments, respectively.

Another reason is that RT has been known to spread disinformation and propaganda, while France24 and Voice of America are more reputable news sources. Finally, RT has been accused of interfering in elections and other domestic affairs in other countries, which could be another reason why it's banned in Germany.

TheMilkyWeigh
Answered over 1yr ago

Why Does Germany Ban RT But Not France24, Or Voice of America?
Russia Today has been banned in Germany. This is a new development that has not happened before. RT is one of the most widely watched TV channels in Russian and English, and it is often accused of spreading misinformation and propaganda. It was also accused of interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when it broadcast third-party debates live on its service, RT America. The network even backed Donald Trump’s campaign by giving him airtime during the primaries to help his chances against Hillary Clinton.

Even though there are many other countries who have banned RT, Germany’s claim to fame is banning it for three years because they believe it poses a "threat to public order." The question remains: Why does Germany ban RT but not France24 or Voice of America?


What is RT?
RT, or Russia Today, is a state-owned TV network that has been accused of spreading misinformation and propaganda since its founding in 2005. RT America, the English branch of RT, broadcast the third-party debates live in the 2016 presidential election. It also gave Donald Trump airtime during the primaries to help his chances against Hillary Clinton.


Why has RT been banned in Germany?
Germany has taken a different approach to their ban of RT. In the past, other countries have banned RT due to biased coverage and misinformation. However, Germany’s ban is not only because of the way it distributes information, but also because of RT’s interference in the German elections.

In this case, there are a few reasons why RT has been banned in Germany. There is evidence that Russia attempted to influence the outcome of presidential elections in Germany through online propaganda and disinformation campaigns. This year's ban is an attempt to prevent future Russian interference. It also comes after warnings from German intelligence that Russia was seeking to extend its reach into Western Europe by meddling in European Union affairs and elections. And if this wasn't enough they may even be trying to destabilize NATO forces in Eastern Europe.


What reasons did the German government give for banning RT?
The German government gave three reasons for banning RT:

- Threat to national security

- Violation of the principles of journalistic freedom and the rules of law

- Violation of the principles of impartiality and objectivity in coverage

The first reason is that they believe RT threatens Germany’s national security. The second reason is that they believe RT violated journalistic freedom and the rules of law. And finally, they believe RT violated impartiality and objectivity in their coverage. These are all pretty good reasons why the German government would want to ban RT.


Is it really a threat to public order?
French TV channel France24 is owned by the French government, but it is not banned in Germany. Voice of America is a U.S. government-sponsored international media organization that reports on events around the world, but also isn't banned in Germany.

So why is RT banned while France24 and Voice of America are not? It seems like only RT was declared a threat to public order. What about these other channels?

It's possible that RT's stance against the governments of Syria and Ukraine has caused some tension with Germany. It also could be that German politicians are anxious about Russia's role in the 2016 U.S presidential election and want to make sure this doesn't happen again with their country, according to CNN Politics Reporter Brian Stelter.

As for France24 or Voice of America - they may be viewed more favorably by Germany because they are not seen as interfering with elections or siding too closely with one country.


Whose responsibility is it to counter misinformation and propaganda, the broadcaster's or the state's?
RT is one of the most widely watched TV channels in Russian and English, and it is often accused of spreading misinformation and propaganda. It was also accused of interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election when it broadcast third-party debates live on its service, RT America. The network even backed Donald Trump’s campaign by giving him airtime during the primaries to help his chances against Hillary Clinton.

Even though there are many other countries who have banned RT, Germany’s claim to fame is banning it for three years because they believe it poses a "threat to public order." The question remains: Why does Germany ban RT but not France24 or Voice of America?

In this case, Germany has been able to ban Russia Today from broadcasting within its country for three years because they believe that it poses a threat to public order. However, RT poses a much bigger problem in Russia than most other countries so the question remains: Is the responsibility for countering misinformation and propaganda one that falls on the broadcaster or is it up to the state?


Conclusion
RT, a TV network funded by the Russian government, has been banned in Germany. Some say the decision is a sign of Germany's deep-seated fear of Russia, while others say it's a prudent measure against misinformation and propaganda.

The Russian broadcaster has been accused of bias and misinformation by many western governments and institutions. With the election of Donald Trump in the US, RT has suddenly found itself at the center of a pitched battle for truth.

RT has been banned in Germany for violating the country's media law: but not in France and not in other countries. This raises many questions about the responsibility to counter misinformation and propaganda: does it lie with the broadcaster or with the state?

We live in an era where misinformation and propaganda can be found everywhere: on mainstream news channels, on social media, and online. It's up to us to question the information we're given and to ask for evidence. And if we're not satisfied with that response, we can always tune into RT for a different perspective.